WebOct 13, 2007 · The things that troubles me with debates over cursors vs set-based logic are: 1) Often the debate crosses platforms. Other database platforms have focused on tuning the cursor engine in ways that SQL Server just never did. 2) A lack of understanding of how set-based logic works (or how powerful it is) ... Using a T-SQL cursor in this … WebSep 12, 2008 · SQL Cursors are fine as long as you use the correct options: INSENSITIVE will make a temporary copy of your result set (saving you from having to do this yourself for your pseudo-cursor). READ_ONLY will make sure …
Why are relational set-based queries better than cursors?
WebMar 15, 2009 · In TSQL, any User Defined Function (UDF) or Cursor that executes on a result set row by row is a procedural approach. For example, if you are querying your … WebOct 21, 2013 · Using the code. For better understanding I create a table name MyTestTable which has 3 fields. Code (char) Name (varchar) Flag (int) Now i want to update Flag field based on the following business logic: if Name field length >=5 then value will be 1. if Name field length >=3 but < 5 then flag value will be 2. beata ratzman malmö
Cursor vs set-based processing - Oracle Forums
WebJan 13, 2024 · The numbers speak for themselves. Using SQL CURSOR consumes more resources and processing time. Hence, before you use SQL CURSOR, try to write a set … WebSo I need help converting this into a SET BASED approach instead of a Procedural Based Approach So the Cursor performs this Logic: WebFeb 28, 2024 · Cursors are an extension to result sets that provide that mechanism. Cursors extend result processing by: Allowing positioning at specific rows of the result set. Retrieving one row or block of rows from the current position in the result set. Supporting data modifications to the rows at the current position in the result set. difen lijek