Webb17 nov. 2024 · The Constitutional Court approvingly quoted from the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment in Phillips v Botha, where the court defined an abuse of process as follows: The term ‘abuse of process’ connotes that the process is employed for some purpose other than the attainment of the claim in the action. WebbPhillips v Botha. Hendricks v Asmal . Bothma v Els. Private prosecution. If state uses bona fide discretion to not prosecute, one can prosecute somebody in private capacity. Aggrieved individuals may proceed in personal capacity against the perpetrator to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Crim proc case summaries - LAW OF CRIMINAL …
Webb28 nov. 2014 · [17] Philips v Botha, a judgment of the high court, also supports their submission that the remittal order is appealable, say the appellants. That case … WebbSee Phillips v Botha (supra) at 11C-H. 38. It is submitted that Respondent has instituted proceedings with the sole purpose of using the law to aggravate and humiliate the accused. This submission is made on two bases. 39. Firstly, Respondent has no prospect of success in this matter. impulsivity and parkinson\u0027s disease
CPR3701 - 2024 OCT NOV & MAY JUNE memo - Studocu
Webbrefuse an interdict for the removal of an encroaching fence.1 In Phillips v South African National Parks Board2 (“Phillips”) a predator-proof fence was erected on the property of … http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/pelj/v16n5/11.pdf WebbPublic: -Duty of the state to prosecute -Prosecu琀椀ng o昀케cials have discre琀椀on whether to prosecute or not -SA does not follow an “obliga琀椀on to prosecute system” -If state refuses to prosecute = vic琀椀m may Privately Prosecute Private Prosecu琀椀on cases: - Phillips v Botha (1999)* - Hendriks v Asmal (2024)* - Bothma v Els (2010) impulsivity and hyperactivity